Date:   Tue, 27 Sep 2022 23:40:56 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
Cc:     linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 13/14] net: dsa: ocelot: add external ocelot
 switch control

On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 05:29:27PM -0700, Colin Foster wrote:
> Add control of an external VSC7512 chip.
> 
> Currently the four copper phy ports are fully functional. Communication to
> external phys is also functional, but the SGMII / QSGMII interfaces are
> currently non-functional.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
> ---
> 
> v3
>     * Remove additional entry in vsc7512_port_modes array
>     * Add MFD_OCELOT namespace import, which is needed for
>       vsc7512_*_io_res

and which hopefully will no longer be

> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/ocelot_ext.c b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/ocelot_ext.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..fb9dbb31fea1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/ocelot_ext.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2021-2022 Innovative Advantage Inc.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/mfd/ocelot.h>
> +#include <linux/phylink.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +#include <soc/mscc/ocelot.h>
> +#include <soc/mscc/vsc7514_regs.h>
> +#include "felix.h"
> +
> +#define VSC7512_NUM_PORTS		11

Is there a difference in port count between VSC7512 and VSC7514? Nope.
Could you please give naming preference to "vsc7514" for things that are
identical?

> +
> +#define OCELOT_PORT_MODE_SERDES		(OCELOT_PORT_MODE_SGMII | \
> +					 OCELOT_PORT_MODE_QSGMII)
> +
> +static const u32 vsc7512_port_modes[VSC7512_NUM_PORTS] = {
> +	OCELOT_PORT_MODE_INTERNAL,
> +	OCELOT_PORT_MODE_INTERNAL,
> +	OCELOT_PORT_MODE_INTERNAL,
> +	OCELOT_PORT_MODE_INTERNAL,
> +	OCELOT_PORT_MODE_SERDES,
> +	OCELOT_PORT_MODE_SERDES,
> +	OCELOT_PORT_MODE_SERDES,
> +	OCELOT_PORT_MODE_SERDES,
> +	OCELOT_PORT_MODE_SERDES,
> +	OCELOT_PORT_MODE_SERDES,
> +	OCELOT_PORT_MODE_SGMII,
> +};
> +
> +static const u32 *vsc7512_regmap[TARGET_MAX] = {
> +	[ANA] = vsc7514_ana_regmap,
> +	[QS] = vsc7514_qs_regmap,
> +	[QSYS] = vsc7514_qsys_regmap,
> +	[REW] = vsc7514_rew_regmap,
> +	[SYS] = vsc7514_sys_regmap,
> +	[S0] = vsc7514_vcap_regmap,
> +	[S1] = vsc7514_vcap_regmap,
> +	[S2] = vsc7514_vcap_regmap,
> +	[PTP] = vsc7514_ptp_regmap,
> +	[DEV_GMII] = vsc7514_dev_gmii_regmap,
> +};

Isn't this precisely the same as ocelot_regmap from
drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c?

> +
> +static void ocelot_ext_phylink_validate(struct ocelot *ocelot, int port,
> +					unsigned long *supported,
> +					struct phylink_link_state *state)
> +{
> +	struct felix *felix = ocelot_to_felix(ocelot);
> +	struct dsa_switch *ds = felix->ds;
> +	struct dsa_port *dp;
> +
> +	dp = dsa_to_port(ds, port);
> +
> +	phylink_generic_validate(&dp->pl_config, supported, state);

It would be good to transition everybody to phylink_generic_validate(),
now that Sean Anderson's PHY rate matching work was accepted. I haven't
found the time to test this on a LS1028A-QDS board, but I hope I will
soon.

> +}
> +
> +static struct regmap *ocelot_ext_regmap_init(struct ocelot *ocelot,
> +					     const char *name)
> +{
> +	/* In the ocelot-mfd configuration, regmaps are attached to the device
> +	 * by name alone, so dev_get_regmap will return the requested regmap
> +	 * without the need to fully define the resource
> +	 */
> +	return dev_get_regmap(ocelot->dev->parent, name);

As discussed: nope.

> +}
> +
> +static const struct ocelot_ops ocelot_ext_ops = {
> +	.reset		= ocelot_reset,
> +	.wm_enc		= ocelot_wm_enc,
> +	.wm_dec		= ocelot_wm_dec,
> +	.wm_stat	= ocelot_wm_stat,
> +	.port_to_netdev	= felix_port_to_netdev,
> +	.netdev_to_port	= felix_netdev_to_port,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct felix_info vsc7512_info = {
> +	.target_io_res			= vsc7512_target_io_res,
> +	.port_io_res			= vsc7512_port_io_res,
> +	.regfields			= vsc7514_regfields,
> +	.map				= vsc7512_regmap,
> +	.ops				= &ocelot_ext_ops,
> +	.stats_layout			= vsc7514_stats_layout,
> +	.vcap				= vsc7514_vcap_props,
> +	.num_mact_rows			= 1024,
> +	.num_ports			= VSC7512_NUM_PORTS,
> +	.num_tx_queues			= OCELOT_NUM_TC,
> +	.phylink_validate		= ocelot_ext_phylink_validate,
> +	.port_modes			= vsc7512_port_modes,
> +	.init_regmap			= ocelot_ext_regmap_init,
> +};
> +
> +static int ocelot_ext_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct dsa_switch *ds;
> +	struct ocelot *ocelot;
> +	struct felix *felix;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	felix = kzalloc(sizeof(*felix), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!felix)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	dev_set_drvdata(dev, felix);
> +
> +	ocelot = &felix->ocelot;
> +	ocelot->dev = dev;
> +
> +	ocelot->num_flooding_pgids = 1;
> +
> +	felix->info = &vsc7512_info;
> +
> +	ds = kzalloc(sizeof(*ds), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!ds) {
> +		err = -ENOMEM;
> +		dev_err_probe(dev, err, "Failed to allocate DSA switch\n");
> +		goto err_free_felix;
> +	}
> +
> +	ds->dev = dev;
> +	ds->num_ports = felix->info->num_ports;
> +	ds->num_tx_queues = felix->info->num_tx_queues;
> +
> +	ds->ops = &felix_switch_ops;
> +	ds->priv = ocelot;
> +	felix->ds = ds;
> +	felix->tag_proto = DSA_TAG_PROTO_OCELOT;
> +
> +	err = dsa_register_switch(ds);
> +	if (err) {
> +		dev_err_probe(dev, err, "Failed to register DSA switch\n");
> +		goto err_free_ds;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_free_ds:
> +	kfree(ds);
> +err_free_felix:
> +	kfree(felix);
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int ocelot_ext_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct felix *felix = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> +
> +	if (!felix)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	dsa_unregister_switch(felix->ds);
> +
> +	kfree(felix->ds);
> +	kfree(felix);
> +
> +	dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, NULL);

The pattern was changed again, so can you please delete this line now,
to be in sync with the other drivers?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220921140524.3831101-12-yangyingliang@huawei.com/

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void ocelot_ext_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct felix *felix = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> +
> +	if (!felix)
> +		return;
> +
> +	dsa_switch_shutdown(felix->ds);
> +
> +	dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id ocelot_ext_switch_of_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "mscc,vsc7512-switch" },
> +	{ },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ocelot_ext_switch_of_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver ocelot_ext_switch_driver = {
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = "ocelot-switch",
> +		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(ocelot_ext_switch_of_match),
> +	},
> +	.probe = ocelot_ext_probe,
> +	.remove = ocelot_ext_remove,
> +	.shutdown = ocelot_ext_shutdown,
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(ocelot_ext_switch_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("External Ocelot Switch driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> +MODULE_IMPORT_NS(MFD_OCELOT);
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists