netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: dsa: felix: update init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220927165139.1ad8538b@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 27 Sep 2022 16:51:39 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        "UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>,
        Maxim Kochetkov <fido_max@...ox.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: dsa: felix: update init_regmap to be
 string-based

On Tue, 27 Sep 2022 19:27:36 +0000 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 10:15:20PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > Existing felix DSA drivers (vsc9959, vsc9953) are all switches that were
> > integrated in NXP SoCs, which makes them a bit unusual compared to the
> > usual Microchip branded Ocelot switches.  
> 
> Damn, I did something stupid, I reworded the commit title for this, and
> I didn't rm -rf the patch output folder first, so now this patch is a
> duplicate of the other 5/5.
> 
> I know I'm going to get a lot of hate for reposting in a matter of
> minutes, so I won't, but on the other hand, patchwork took the wrong
> patch (this one) as part of the series, and the other one as "Untitled
> series #681176". The code is the same, just the commit message differs.
> 
> Can that be fixed in post-production or something?

Just replace the commit message with the other 5/5? Can do.