netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC xfrm-next v3 7/8] xfrm: add support to HW update soft and hard limits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 27 Sep 2022 07:49:04 +0200
From:   Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
CC:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Raed Salem <raeds@...dia.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC xfrm-next v3 7/8] xfrm: add support to HW update soft
 and hard limits

On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 09:07:31AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 11:20:06AM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 04:15:41PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> > > 
> > > Both in RX and TX, the traffic that performs IPsec full offload
> > > transformation is accounted by HW. It is needed to properly handle
> > > hard limits that require to drop the packet.
> > > 
> > > It means that XFRM core needs to update internal counters with the one
> > > that accounted by the HW, so new callbacks are introduced in this patch.
> > > 
> > > In case of soft or hard limit is occurred, the driver should call to
> > > xfrm_state_check_expire() that will perform key rekeying exactly as
> > > done by XFRM core.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> > 
> > This looks good, thanks!
> > 
> > We need this for the other relevant counters too.
> 
> It is in my backlog.

Great, thanks!