[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220928090629.1124190-2-mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 11:06:29 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Jacob Kroon <jacob.kroon@...il.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net] can: c_can: don't cache TX messages for C_CAN cores
As Jacob noticed, the optimization introduced in 387da6bc7a82 ("can:
c_can: cache frames to operate as a true FIFO") doesn't properly work
on C_CAN, but on D_CAN IP cores. The exact reasons are still unknown.
For now disable caching if CAN frames in the TX path for C_CAN cores.
Fixes: 387da6bc7a82 ("can: c_can: cache frames to operate as a true FIFO")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220928083354.1062321-1-mkl@pengutronix.de
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/15a8084b-9617-2da1-6704-d7e39d60643b@gmail.com
Reported-by: Jacob Kroon <jacob.kroon@...il.com>
Tested-by: Jacob Kroon <jacob.kroon@...il.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v5.15
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
---
drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h | 17 +++++++++++++++--
drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_main.c | 11 +++++------
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h
index f23a03300a81..029cd8194ed5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h
+++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h
@@ -235,9 +235,22 @@ static inline u8 c_can_get_tx_tail(const struct c_can_tx_ring *ring)
return ring->tail & (ring->obj_num - 1);
}
-static inline u8 c_can_get_tx_free(const struct c_can_tx_ring *ring)
+static inline u8 c_can_get_tx_free(const struct c_can_priv *priv,
+ const struct c_can_tx_ring *ring)
{
- return ring->obj_num - (ring->head - ring->tail);
+ u8 head = c_can_get_tx_head(ring);
+ u8 tail = c_can_get_tx_tail(ring);
+
+ if (priv->type == BOSCH_D_CAN)
+ return ring->obj_num - (ring->head - ring->tail);
+
+ /* This is not a FIFO. C/D_CAN sends out the buffers
+ * prioritized. The lowest buffer number wins.
+ */
+ if (head < tail)
+ return 0;
+
+ return ring->obj_num - head;
}
#endif /* C_CAN_H */
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_main.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_main.c
index dc8132862f33..d6605dbb7737 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_main.c
@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static void c_can_setup_receive_object(struct net_device *dev, int iface,
static bool c_can_tx_busy(const struct c_can_priv *priv,
const struct c_can_tx_ring *tx_ring)
{
- if (c_can_get_tx_free(tx_ring) > 0)
+ if (c_can_get_tx_free(priv, tx_ring) > 0)
return false;
netif_stop_queue(priv->dev);
@@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ static bool c_can_tx_busy(const struct c_can_priv *priv,
/* Memory barrier before checking tx_free (head and tail) */
smp_mb();
- if (c_can_get_tx_free(tx_ring) == 0) {
+ if (c_can_get_tx_free(priv, tx_ring) == 0) {
netdev_dbg(priv->dev,
"Stopping tx-queue (tx_head=0x%08x, tx_tail=0x%08x, len=%d).\n",
tx_ring->head, tx_ring->tail,
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t c_can_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
idx = c_can_get_tx_head(tx_ring);
tx_ring->head++;
- if (c_can_get_tx_free(tx_ring) == 0)
+ if (c_can_get_tx_free(priv, tx_ring) == 0)
netif_stop_queue(dev);
if (idx < c_can_get_tx_tail(tx_ring))
@@ -748,7 +748,7 @@ static void c_can_do_tx(struct net_device *dev)
return;
tx_ring->tail += pkts;
- if (c_can_get_tx_free(tx_ring)) {
+ if (c_can_get_tx_free(priv, tx_ring)) {
/* Make sure that anybody stopping the queue after
* this sees the new tx_ring->tail.
*/
@@ -760,8 +760,7 @@ static void c_can_do_tx(struct net_device *dev)
stats->tx_packets += pkts;
tail = c_can_get_tx_tail(tx_ring);
-
- if (tail == 0) {
+ if (priv->type == BOSCH_D_CAN && tail == 0) {
u8 head = c_can_get_tx_head(tx_ring);
/* Start transmission for all cached messages */
base-commit: 44d70bb561dac9363f45787aa93dfca36877ee01
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists