[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iLdDbkFWWPh8tPp71-PNf-FY=DqODhqqQ+iUN+o2=GwYw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 20:49:55 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@...com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@...il.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Fix incorrect address comparison when
searching for a bind2 bucket
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 5:25 PM Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com> wrote:
>
> From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>
>
> The v6_rcv_saddr and rcv_saddr are inside a union in the
> 'struct inet_bind2_bucket'. When searching a bucket by following the
> bhash2 hashtable chain, eg. inet_bind2_bucket_match, it is only using
> the sk->sk_family and there is no way to check if the inet_bind2_bucket
> has a v6 or v4 address in the union. This leads to an uninit-value
> KMSAN report in [0] and also potentially incorrect matches.
I do not see the KMSAN report, is it missing from this changelog ?
Thanks.
>
> This patch fixes it by adding a family member to the inet_bind2_bucket
> and then tests 'sk->sk_family != tb->family' before matching
> the sk's address to the tb's address.
>
> Cc: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@...il.com>
> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
> Fixes: 28044fc1d495 ("net: Add a bhash2 table hashed by port and address")
> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>
> ---
> include/net/inet_hashtables.h | 3 +++
> net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/inet_hashtables.h b/include/net/inet_hashtables.h
> index 9121ccab1fa1..3af1e927247d 100644
> --- a/include/net/inet_hashtables.h
> +++ b/include/net/inet_hashtables.h
> @@ -95,6 +95,9 @@ struct inet_bind2_bucket {
> possible_net_t ib_net;
> int l3mdev;
> unsigned short port;
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> + unsigned short family;
> +#endif
> union {
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> struct in6_addr v6_rcv_saddr;
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
> index 74e64aad5114..49db8c597eea 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
> @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ static void inet_bind2_bucket_init(struct inet_bind2_bucket *tb,
> tb->l3mdev = l3mdev;
> tb->port = port;
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> + tb->family = sk->sk_family;
> if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET6)
> tb->v6_rcv_saddr = sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr;
> else
> @@ -146,6 +147,9 @@ static bool inet_bind2_bucket_addr_match(const struct inet_bind2_bucket *tb2,
> const struct sock *sk)
> {
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> + if (sk->sk_family != tb2->family)
> + return false;
> +
> if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET6)
> return ipv6_addr_equal(&tb2->v6_rcv_saddr,
> &sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr);
> @@ -791,6 +795,9 @@ static bool inet_bind2_bucket_match(const struct inet_bind2_bucket *tb,
> int l3mdev, const struct sock *sk)
> {
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> + if (sk->sk_family != tb->family)
> + return false;
> +
> if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET6)
> return net_eq(ib2_net(tb), net) && tb->port == port &&
> tb->l3mdev == l3mdev &&
> @@ -807,6 +814,9 @@ bool inet_bind2_bucket_match_addr_any(const struct inet_bind2_bucket *tb, const
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> struct in6_addr addr_any = {};
>
> + if (sk->sk_family != tb->family)
> + return false;
> +
> if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET6)
> return net_eq(ib2_net(tb), net) && tb->port == port &&
> tb->l3mdev == l3mdev &&
> --
> 2.30.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists