[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6c64b772-7b2b-77f8-4523-4408e0b3bf8a@6wind.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 11:02:51 +0200
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
robh@...nel.org, johannes@...solutions.net, ecree.xilinx@...il.com,
stephen@...workplumber.org, sdf@...gle.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
fw@...len.de, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, razor@...ckwall.org,
gnault@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/6] netlink: add a proto specification for FOU
Le 29/09/2022 à 03:11, Jakub Kicinski a écrit :
> FOU has a reasonably modern Genetlink family. Add a spec.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> ---
> Documentation/netlink/specs/fou.yaml | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/netlink/specs/fou.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/netlink/specs/fou.yaml b/Documentation/netlink/specs/fou.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..266c386eedf3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/netlink/specs/fou.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
> +name: fou
> +
> +protocol: genetlink-legacy
> +
> +doc: |
> + Foo-over-UDP.
> +
> +c-family-name: fou-genl-name
> +c-version-name: fou-genl-version
> +max-by-define: true
> +kernel-policy: global
> +
> +definitions:
> + -
> + type: enum
> + name: encap_type
> + name-prefix: fou-encap-
> + enum-name:
> + entries: [ unspec, direct, gue ]
> +
> +attribute-sets:
> + -
> + name: fou
> + name-prefix: fou-attr-
> + attributes:
> + -
> + name: unspec
> + type: unused
The first attribute should always be unspec/unused. Maybe it could be
automatically generated?
> + -
> + name: port
> + type: u16
> + byte-order: big-endian
> + -
> + name: af
> + type: u8
> + -
> + name: ipproto
> + type: u8
> + -
> + name: type
> + type: u8
> + -
> + name: remcsum_nopartial
> + type: flag
> + -
> + name: local_v4
> + type: u32
> + -
> + name: local_v6
> + type: binary
> + checks:
> + min-len: 16
> + -
> + name: peer_v4
> + type: u32
> + -
> + name: peer_v6
> + type: binary
> + checks:
> + min-len: 16
> + -
> + name: peer_port
> + type: u16
> + byte-order: big-endian
> + -
> + name: ifindex
> + type: s32
> +
> +operations:
> + list:
> + -
> + name: unspec
> + doc: unused
To what correspond this name?
It helps to name the generated operations array?
Something else than 'const struct genl_small_ops fou_ops[3]'?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists