netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] docs: add more netlink docs (incl. spec docs)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220929133413.GA6761@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Thu, 29 Sep 2022 15:34:13 +0200
From:   Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
        pabeni@...hat.com, robh@...nel.org, johannes@...solutions.net,
        ecree.xilinx@...il.com, stephen@...workplumber.org, sdf@...gle.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, fw@...len.de, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        razor@...ckwall.org, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] docs: add more netlink docs (incl. spec
 docs)

On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 06:11:17PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> +Answer requests
> +---------------
> +
> +Older families do not reply to all of the commands, especially NEW / ADD
> +commands. User only gets information whether the operation succeeded or
> +not via the ACK. Try to find useful data to return. Once the command is
> +added whether it replies with a full message or only an ACK is uAPI and
> +cannot be changed. It's better to err on the side of replying.
> +
> +Specifically NEW and ADD commands should reply with information identifying
> +the created object such as the allocated object's ID.
> +
> +Having to rely on ``NLM_F_ECHO`` is a hack, not a valid design.
> +
> +NLM_F_ECHO
> +----------
> +
> +Make sure to pass the request info to genl_notify() to allow ``NLM_F_ECHO``
> +to take effect.

Do you mean that netlink commands should properly handle NLM_F_ECHO,
although they should also design their API so that users don't need it?