[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220929084312.2a216698@hermes.local>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 08:43:12 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Hans Schultz <netdev@...io-technology.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Joachim Wiberg <troglobit@...il.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Amit Cohen <amcohen@...dia.com>,
Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Hans Schultz <schultz.hans@...il.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Yuwei Wang <wangyuweihx@...il.com>,
Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Florent Fourcot <florent.fourcot@...irst.fr>
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH iproute2-next 2/2] bridge: fdb: enable FDB
blackhole feature
On Thu, 29 Sep 2022 17:21:37 +0200
Hans Schultz <netdev@...io-technology.com> wrote:
>
> @@ -493,6 +496,8 @@ static int fdb_modify(int cmd, int flags, int argc, char **argv)
> req.ndm.ndm_flags |= NTF_EXT_LEARNED;
> } else if (matches(*argv, "sticky") == 0) {
> req.ndm.ndm_flags |= NTF_STICKY;
> + } else if (matches(*argv, "blackhole") == 0) {
> + ext_flags |= NTF_EXT_BLACKHOLE;
> } else {
> if (strcmp(*argv, "to") == 0)
> NEXT_ARG();
The parsing of flags is weird here, most of the flags are compared with strcmp()
but some use matches().. I should have used strcmp() all the time; but at the
time did not realize what kind of confusion matches() can cause.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists