[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <166446961694.21206.2321358464670286333.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 16:40:16 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org,
andrii@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 0/5] bpf: Remove recursion check for struct_ops
prog
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2022 00:04:02 -0700 you wrote:
> From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>
>
> The struct_ops is sharing the tracing-trampoline's enter/exit
> function which tracks prog->active to avoid recursion. It turns
> out the struct_ops bpf prog will hit this prog->active and
> unnecessarily skipped running the struct_ops prog. eg. The
> '.ssthresh' may run in_task() and then interrupted by softirq
> that runs the same '.ssthresh'.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v3,bpf-next,1/5] bpf: Add __bpf_prog_{enter,exit}_struct_ops for struct_ops trampoline
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/64696c40d03c
- [v3,bpf-next,2/5] bpf: Move the "cdg" tcp-cc check to the common sol_tcp_sockopt()
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/37cfbe0bf2e8
- [v3,bpf-next,3/5] bpf: Refactor bpf_setsockopt(TCP_CONGESTION) handling into another function
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/1e7d217faa11
- [v3,bpf-next,4/5] bpf: tcp: Stop bpf_setsockopt(TCP_CONGESTION) in init ops to recur itself
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/061ff040710e
- [v3,bpf-next,5/5] selftests/bpf: Check -EBUSY for the recurred bpf_setsockopt(TCP_CONGESTION)
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/3411c5b6f8d6
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists