[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yzbi335GQGbGLL4k@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 14:36:47 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PHY firmware update method
> Yeah, I tend to agree here. I believe that phylib should probably find a
> separate way to to the flash.
>
> But perhaps it could be a non-user-facing flash. I mean, what if phylib
> has internal routine to:
> 1) do query phy fw version
> 2) load a fw bin related for this phy (easy phy driver may provide the
> path/name of the file)
> 3) flash if there is a newer version available
That was my first suggestion. One problem is getting the version from
the binary blob firmware. But this seems like a generic problem for
linux-firmware, so maybe somebody has worked on a standardised header
which can be preppended with this meta data?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists