netdev - Re: [PATCHv5 net-next 1/4] rtnetlink: add new helper rtnl_configure_link

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ede1abd0-970a-dec8-4dee-290d4a43200f@6wind.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Sep 2022 16:22:19 +0200
From:   Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To:     Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
        Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>,
        Florent Fourcot <florent.fourcot@...irst.fr>,
        Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
        Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 net-next 1/4] rtnetlink: add new helper
 rtnl_configure_link_notify()


Le 30/09/2022 à 11:45, Hangbin Liu a écrit :
> This patch update rtnl_configure_link() to rtnl_configure_link_nlh() by
> adding parameter netlink message header and port id so we can notify the
> userspace about the new link info if NLM_F_ECHO flag is set.
> 
> The rtnl_configure_link() will be a wrapper of the new function. The new
> call chain looks like:
> 
> - rtnl_configure_link_notify()
>   - __dev_notify_flags()
>     - rtmsg_ifinfo_nlh()
>       - rtmsg_ifinfo_event()
>         - rtmsg_ifinfo_build_skb()
>         - rtmsg_ifinfo_send()
> 
> All the functions in this call chain will add parameter nlh and pid, so
> we can use them in the last call rtnl_notify().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/netdevice.h |  2 +-
>  include/linux/rtnetlink.h |  6 ++++--
>  net/core/dev.c            | 14 ++++++-------
>  net/core/rtnetlink.c      | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index eddf8ee270e7..a71d378945e3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -3856,7 +3856,7 @@ int __dev_change_flags(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int flags,
>  int dev_change_flags(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int flags,
>  		     struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>  void __dev_notify_flags(struct net_device *, unsigned int old_flags,
> -			unsigned int gchanges);
> +			unsigned int gchanges, u32 pid, struct nlmsghdr *nlh);
Order is pid/nlh.

[snip]

> +void rtmsg_ifinfo_nlh(int type, struct net_device *dev, unsigned int change,
> +		      gfp_t flags, u32 pid, struct nlmsghdr *nlh);
Same here.

>  struct sk_buff *rtmsg_ifinfo_build_skb(int type, struct net_device *dev,
>  				       unsigned change, u32 event,
>  				       gfp_t flags, int *new_nsid,
> -				       int new_ifindex);
> +				       int new_ifindex, u32 pid, u32 seq);
Same here.

>  void rtmsg_ifinfo_send(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> -		       gfp_t flags);
> +		       gfp_t flags, u32 pid, struct nlmsghdr *nlh);
Same here.

[snip]


> -int rtnl_configure_link(struct net_device *dev, const struct ifinfomsg *ifm)
> +static int rtnl_configure_link_notify(struct net_device *dev, const struct ifinfomsg *ifm,
> +				      struct nlmsghdr *nlh, u32 pid)
But not here. Following patches also use this order instead of the previous one.
For consistency, it could be good to keep the same order everywhere.


Regards,
Nicolas