[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220930162849.GE10057@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 18:28:49 +0200
From: Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>,
Florent Fourcot <florent.fourcot@...irst.fr>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 net-next 1/4] rtnetlink: add new helper
rtnl_configure_link_notify()
> @@ -3856,7 +3856,7 @@ int __dev_change_flags(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int flags,
> int dev_change_flags(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int flags,
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> void __dev_notify_flags(struct net_device *, unsigned int old_flags,
> - unsigned int gchanges);
> + unsigned int gchanges, u32 pid, struct nlmsghdr *nlh);
In all the modified functions, you could make struct nlmsghdr * a const
pointer. You just need to also update rtnl_notify() to make its nlh
parameter const too.
> +void rtmsg_ifinfo_nlh(int type, struct net_device *dev, unsigned int change,
> + gfp_t flags, u32 pid, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
> +{
> + rtmsg_ifinfo_event(type, dev, change, rtnl_get_event(0), flags,
> + NULL, 0, pid, nlh);
> }
Can't we just add the extra parameters to rtmsg_ifinfo() and trivially
adapt the few users to the new prototype? Maybe that's a personal
taste, but I find such wrapper unnecessary.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists