lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 04 Oct 2022 09:51:07 +0200
From:   Johannes Berg <>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <>
Cc:     "" <>,
Subject: Re: doc warnings in *80211


> doing basic sanity checks before submitting the net-next PR I spotted
> that we have these warnings when building documentation on net-next:
> Documentation/driver-api/80211/cfg80211:48: ./include/net/cfg80211.h:6960: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at driver-api/80211/cfg80211:6924.
> Declaration is '.. c:function:: void cfg80211_rx_assoc_resp (struct net_device *dev, struct cfg80211_rx_assoc_resp *data)'.

Hmm. That's interesting. I guess it cannot distinguish between the type
of identifier?

struct cfg80211_rx_assoc_resp vs. cfg80211_rx_assoc_resp()

Not sure what do about it - rename one of them?

> Documentation/driver-api/80211/mac80211:109: ./include/net/mac80211.h:5046: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at driver-api/80211/mac80211:1065.
> Declaration is '.. c:function:: void ieee80211_tx_status (struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct sk_buff *skb)'.

Same here actually!

I don't think either of these is new.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists