lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 15:15:17 +0300 From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> Cc: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 12/14] dt-bindings: net: dsa: ocelot: add ocelot-ext documentation On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 01:19:33PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > + # Ocelot-ext VSC7512 > > + - | > > + spi { > > + soc@0 { > > soc in spi is a bit confusing. Do you have a better suggestion for a node name? This is effectively a container for peripherals which would otherwise live under a /soc node, if they were accessed over MMIO by the internal microprocessor of the SoC, rather than by an external processor over SPI. > How is this example different than previous one (existing soc example)? > If by compatible and number of ports, then there is no much value here. The positioning relative to the other nodes is what's different.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists