[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yzww1LRLIE+It6J8@kadam>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 16:10:44 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux_oss@...debyte.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
syzbot+67d13108d855f451cafc@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, ericvh@...il.com,
kuba@...nel.org, lucho@...kov.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "9p: p9_client_create: use p9_client_destroy
on failure"
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 12:37:55PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> Rely on proper unwind order.
>
> This reverts commit 3ff51294a05529d0baf6d4b2517e561d12efb9f9.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+67d13108d855f451cafc@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
The commit message doesn't really say what the problem is to the user.
Is this just to make the next patch easier?
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists