lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Yzww1LRLIE+It6J8@kadam> Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 16:10:44 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> Cc: v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux_oss@...debyte.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>, syzbot+67d13108d855f451cafc@...kaller.appspotmail.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, ericvh@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org, lucho@...kov.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "9p: p9_client_create: use p9_client_destroy on failure" On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 12:37:55PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > Rely on proper unwind order. > > This reverts commit 3ff51294a05529d0baf6d4b2517e561d12efb9f9. > > Reported-by: syzbot+67d13108d855f451cafc@...kaller.appspotmail.com > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> The commit message doesn't really say what the problem is to the user. Is this just to make the next patch easier? regards, dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists