lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221005001406.GA2291@bytedance>
Date:   Tue, 4 Oct 2022 17:14:06 -0700
From:   Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@...il.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Peilin Ye <peilin.ye@...edance.com>,
        Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/sock: Introduce trace_sk_data_ready()

On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 09:19:34AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> I would rather split this in two parts.
> 
> First patch adding and using a common helper.
> 
> static inline void sock_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
> {
>      sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
> }
> 
> s/sk->sk_data_ready(sk)/sock_data_ready(sk)/
> 
> 
> Second patch adding the tracing point once in the helper ?
> 
> Alternatively, why not add the tracepoint directly in the called
> functions (we have few of them),
> instead of all call points ?

Thanks for the suggestions.  I will move this tracepoint into callees in
v2.

Thanks,
Peilin Ye

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ