[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221004172334.2cb0233e@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 17:23:34 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+3a080099974c271cd7e9@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
fw@...len.de, harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [syzbot] upstream boot error: WARNING in netlink_ack
On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 17:04:00 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > why does a fixed size mean no memset?
>
> Copy and paste, it seems to originate from:
>
> 0c19b0adb8dd ("netlink: avoid memset of 0 bytes sparse warning")
>
> Any idea why sparse would not like empty memsets?
Google answers is. Let me test if sparse still wants the workaround.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists