netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: sched: add helper support in act

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yz7iDEjVbHrPUPT4@salvia>
Date:   Thu, 6 Oct 2022 16:11:24 +0200
From:   Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:     Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc:     network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, dev@...nvswitch.org,
        ovs-dev@...nvswitch.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@....org>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
        Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>,
        Oz Shlomo <ozsh@...dia.com>, Paul Blakey <paulb@...dia.com>,
        Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@....org>,
        Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: sched: add helper support in act_ct

On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 09:19:56PM -0400, Xin Long wrote:
[...]
> @@ -1119,6 +1135,22 @@ static int tcf_ct_act(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a,
>  	if (err != NF_ACCEPT)
>  		goto drop;
>  
> +	if (commit && p->helper && !nfct_help(ct)) {
> +		err = __nf_ct_try_assign_helper(ct, p->tmpl, GFP_ATOMIC);
> +		if (err)
> +			goto drop;
> +		add_helper = true;
> +		if (p->ct_action & TCA_CT_ACT_NAT && !nfct_seqadj(ct)) {
> +			if (!nfct_seqadj_ext_add(ct))

You can only add ct extensions if ct is !nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct)), is
this guaranteed in this codepath?

> +				return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct) ? ((!cached && !skip_add) || add_helper) : commit) {
> +		if (nf_ct_helper(skb, family) != NF_ACCEPT)
> +			goto drop;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (commit) {
>  		tcf_ct_act_set_mark(ct, p->mark, p->mark_mask);
>  		tcf_ct_act_set_labels(ct, p->labels, p->labels_mask);