| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 11:08:23 +0300
From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
Cc: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
brouer@...hat.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: fec: add initial XDP support
Hi Jesper,
On Thu, 6 Oct 2022 at 11:37, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 05/10/2022 14.40, Shenwei Wang wrote:
> > Hi Jesper,
> >
> > Here is the summary of "xdp_rxq_info" testing.
> >
> > skb_mark_for_recycle page_pool_release_page
> >
> > Native SKB-Mode Native SKB-Mode
> > XDP_DROP 460K 220K 460K 102K
> > XDP_PASS 80K 113K 60K 62K
> >
>
> It is very pleasing to see the *huge* performance benefit that page_pool
> provide when recycling pages for SKBs (via skb_mark_for_recycle).
> I did expect a performance boost, but not around a x2 performance boost.
Indeed that's a pleasant surprise. Keep in mind that if we convert
more driver we
can also get rid of copy_break code sprinkled around in drivers.
Thanks
/Ilias
>
> I guess this platform have a larger overhead for DMA-mapping and
> page-allocation.
>
> IMHO it would be valuable to include this result as part of the patch
> description when you post the XDP patch again.
>
> Only strange result is XDP_PASS 'Native' is slower that 'SKB-mode'. I
> cannot explain why, as XDP_PASS essentially does nothing and just follow
> normal driver code to netstack.
>
> Thanks a lot for doing these tests.
> --Jesper
>
> > The following are the testing log.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shenwei
> >
> > ### skb_mark_for_recycle solution ###
> >
> > ./xdp_rxq_info --dev eth0 --act XDP_DROP --read
> >
> > Running XDP on dev:eth0 (ifindex:2) action:XDP_DROP options:read
> > XDP stats CPU pps issue-pps
> > XDP-RX CPU 0 466,553 0
> > XDP-RX CPU total 466,553
> >
> > ./xdp_rxq_info -S --dev eth0 --act XDP_DROP --read
> >
> > Running XDP on dev:eth0 (ifindex:2) action:XDP_DROP options:read
> > XDP stats CPU pps issue-pps
> > XDP-RX CPU 0 226,272 0
> > XDP-RX CPU total 226,272
> >
> > ./xdp_rxq_info --dev eth0 --act XDP_PASS --read
> >
> > Running XDP on dev:eth0 (ifindex:2) action:XDP_PASS options:read
> > XDP stats CPU pps issue-pps
> > XDP-RX CPU 0 80,518 0
> > XDP-RX CPU total 80,518
> >
> > ./xdp_rxq_info -S --dev eth0 --act XDP_PASS --read
> >
> > Running XDP on dev:eth0 (ifindex:2) action:XDP_PASS options:read
> > XDP stats CPU pps issue-pps
> > XDP-RX CPU 0 113,681 0
> > XDP-RX CPU total 113,681
> >
> >
> > ### page_pool_release_page solution ###
> >
> > ./xdp_rxq_info --dev eth0 --act XDP_DROP --read
> >
> > Running XDP on dev:eth0 (ifindex:2) action:XDP_DROP options:read
> > XDP stats CPU pps issue-pps
> > XDP-RX CPU 0 463,145 0
> > XDP-RX CPU total 463,145
> >
> > ./xdp_rxq_info -S --dev eth0 --act XDP_DROP --read
> >
> > Running XDP on dev:eth0 (ifindex:2) action:XDP_DROP options:read
> > XDP stats CPU pps issue-pps
> > XDP-RX CPU 0 104,443 0
> > XDP-RX CPU total 104,443
> >
> > ./xdp_rxq_info --dev eth0 --act XDP_PASS --read
> >
> > Running XDP on dev:eth0 (ifindex:2) action:XDP_PASS options:read
> > XDP stats CPU pps issue-pps
> > XDP-RX CPU 0 60,539 0
> > XDP-RX CPU total 60,539
> >
> > ./xdp_rxq_info -S --dev eth0 --act XDP_PASS --read
> >
> > Running XDP on dev:eth0 (ifindex:2) action:XDP_PASS options:read
> > XDP stats CPU pps issue-pps
> > XDP-RX CPU 0 62,566 0
> > XDP-RX CPU total 62,566
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Shenwei Wang
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2022 8:34 AM
> >> To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>; Andrew Lunn
> >> <andrew@...n.ch>
> >> Cc: brouer@...hat.com; David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Eric Dumazet
> >> <edumazet@...gle.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Paolo Abeni
> >> <pabeni@...hat.com>; Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>; Daniel Borkmann
> >> <daniel@...earbox.net>; Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>; John
> >> Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> >> kernel@...r.kernel.org; imx@...ts.linux.dev; Magnus Karlsson
> >> <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>; Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>; Ilias
> >> Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
> >> Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: fec: add initial XDP support
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Shenwei Wang
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2022 8:13 AM
> >>> To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>; Andrew Lunn
> >> ...
> >>> I haven't tested xdp_rxq_info yet, and will have a try sometime later today.
> >>> However, for the XDP_DROP test, I did try xdp2 test case, and the
> >>> testing result looks reasonable. The performance of Native mode is
> >>> much higher than skb- mode.
> >>>
> >>> # xdp2 eth0
> >>> proto 0: 475362 pkt/s
> >>>
> >>> # xdp2 -S eth0 (page_pool_release_page solution)
> >>> proto 17: 71999 pkt/s
> >>>
> >>> # xdp2 -S eth0 (skb_mark_for_recycle solution)
> >>> proto 17: 72228 pkt/s
> >>>
> >>
> >> Correction for xdp2 -S eth0 (skb_mark_for_recycle solution)
> >> proto 0: 0 pkt/s
> >> proto 17: 122473 pkt/s
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Shenwei
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists