netdev - Re: [PATCH] taprio: Set the value of picos_per_byte before fill sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a8dc6b79-2741-d101-d9a8-4521406ef7d6@kylinos.cn>
Date:   Fri, 30 Sep 2022 19:18:52 +0800
From:   jianghaoran <jianghaoran@...inos.cn>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     vinicius.gomes@...el.com, jhs@...atatu.com,
        xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vladimir.oltean@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] taprio: Set the value of picos_per_byte before fill
 sched_entry



在 2022/9/30 上午10:18, Jakub Kicinski 写道:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 14:58:30 +0800 jianghaoran wrote:
>> If the value of picos_per_byte is set after fill sched_entry,
>> as a result, the min_duration calculated by length_to_duration is 0,
>> and the validity of the input interval cannot be judged,
>> too small intervals couldn't allow any packet to be transmitted.
> 
> Meaning an invalid configuration is accepted but no packets
> can ever be transmitted?  Could you make the user-visible
> issue clearer?
   Yes, It's possible that the user specifies an too small interval that 
couldn't allow any packet to be transmitted.According to the following 
example, the interval is set to 9, and the network port enp5s0f0 cannot 
send any data
> 
>> It will appear like commit b5b73b26b3ca ("taprio:
>> Fix allowing too small intervals") described problem.
>> Here is a further modification of this problem.
>>
>> example:
> 
> Here as well it seems worthwhile to mention what this is an example of.
> e.g. "example configuration which will not be able to transmit packets"
> 
>> tc qdisc replace dev enp5s0f0 parent root handle 100 taprio \
>>                num_tc 3 \
>>                map 2 2 1 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 \
>>                queues 1@0 1@1 2@2 \
>>                base-time  1528743495910289987 \
>>                sched-entry S 01 9 \
>> 	      sched-entry S 02 9 \
>> 	      sched-entry S 04 9 \
>>                clockid CLOCK_TAI
> 
> Please add a Fixes tag pointing to the first commit where the issue was
> present, and CC Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com> on the next
> version.
> 
Thank you for your suggestion. I will modify it as suggested