lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 08:49:46 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> To: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>, Vikas Gupta <vikas.gupta@...adcom.com>, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, gnault@...hat.com, johannes@...solutions.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 17/77] genetlink: hold read cb_lock during iteration of genl_fam_idr in genl_bind() On Sun, 9 Oct 2022 18:06:54 -0400 Sasha Levin wrote: > In genl_bind(), currently genl_lock and write cb_lock are taken > for iteration of genl_fam_idr and processing of static values > stored in struct genl_family. Take just read cb_lock for this task > as it is sufficient to guard the idr and the struct against > concurrent genl_register/unregister_family() calls. > > This will allow to run genl command processing in genl_rcv() and > mnl_socket_setsockopt(.., NETLINK_ADD_MEMBERSHIP, ..) in parallel. Not stable material, please drop.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists