[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6f3088a8-284d-d71f-68d1-01a5412bfff2@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 10:32:07 -0400
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>
Cc: MichaĆ Grzelak <mig@...ihalf.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, upstream@...ihalf.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: net: marvell,pp2: convert to
json-schema
On 11/10/2022 16:34, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
>>
>> Keep the same order of items here as in list of properties
>>
>>> +
>>> +required:
>>> + - compatible
>>> + - reg
>>> + - clocks
>>> + - clock-names
>>> +
>>> +allOf:
>>> + - $ref: ethernet-controller.yaml#
>>
>> Hmm, are you sure this applies to top-level properties, not to
>> ethernet-port subnodes? Your ports have phy-mode and phy - just like
>> ethernet-controller. If I understand correctly, your Armada Ethernet
>> Controller actually consists of multiple ethernet controllers?
>>
>
> PP2 is a single controller with common HW blocks, such as queue/buffer
> management, parser/classifier, register space, and more. It controls
> up to 3 MAC's (ports) that can be connected to phys, sfp cages, etc.
> The latter cannot exist on their own and IMO the current hierarchy -
> the main controller with subnodes (ports) properly reflects the
> hardware.
>
> Anyway, the ethernet-controller.yaml properties fit to the subnodes.
> Apart from the name. The below is IMO a good description:.
It also starts to look a bit like a switch (see bindings/net/dsa).
>
>> If so, this should be moved to proper place inside patternProperties.
>> Maybe the subnodes should also be renamed from ports to just "ethernet"
>> (as ethernet-controller.yaml expects), but other schemas do not follow
>> this convention,
>
> ethernet@
> {
> ethernet-port@0
> {
> }
> ethernet-port@1
> {
> }
> }
>
> What do you recommend?
Yes, keep it like this and reference the ethernet-controller.yaml in
each port.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists