lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Y0ZXiDiqxYb7yYmS@unreal> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 08:58:32 +0300 From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> To: Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@...il.com> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Peilin Ye <peilin.ye@...edance.com>, Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net/sock: Introduce trace_sk_data_ready() On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 12:58:56PM -0700, Peilin Ye wrote: > From: Peilin Ye <peilin.ye@...edance.com> > > As suggested by Cong, introduce a tracepoint for all ->sk_data_ready() > callback implementations. For example: > > <...> > dpkg-deb-7752 [000] ..... 145.660735: sk_data_ready: family=16 protocol=16 func=sock_def_readable > dpkg-deb-7757 [000] ..... 145.759168: sk_data_ready: family=16 protocol=16 func=sock_def_readable > dpkg-deb-7758 [000] ..... 145.763956: sk_data_ready: family=16 protocol=16 func=sock_def_readable > <...> > > Suggested-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com> > Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye <peilin.ye@...edance.com> > --- > change since v2: > - Fix modpost error for modules (kernel test robot) > > changes since v1: > - Move tracepoint into ->sk_data_ready() callback implementations > (Eric Dumazet) > - Fix W=1 warning (Jakub Kicinski) > > drivers/infiniband/hw/erdma/erdma_cm.c | 3 +++ > drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c | 5 +++++ > drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp.c | 3 +++ > drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c | 3 +++ > drivers/nvme/target/tcp.c | 5 +++++ > drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c | 3 +++ > drivers/soc/qcom/qmi_interface.c | 3 +++ > drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c | 2 ++ > drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c | 5 +++++ > fs/dlm/lowcomms.c | 5 +++++ > fs/ocfs2/cluster/tcp.c | 5 +++++ > include/trace/events/sock.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > net/ceph/messenger.c | 4 ++++ > net/core/net-traces.c | 2 ++ > net/core/skmsg.c | 3 +++ > net/core/sock.c | 2 ++ > net/kcm/kcmsock.c | 3 +++ > net/mptcp/subflow.c | 3 +++ > net/qrtr/ns.c | 3 +++ > net/rds/tcp_listen.c | 2 ++ > net/rds/tcp_recv.c | 2 ++ > net/sctp/socket.c | 3 +++ > net/smc/smc_rx.c | 3 +++ > net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 5 +++++ > net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c | 3 +++ > net/tipc/socket.c | 3 +++ > net/tipc/topsrv.c | 5 +++++ > net/tls/tls_sw.c | 3 +++ > net/xfrm/espintcp.c | 3 +++ > 29 files changed, 118 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/erdma/erdma_cm.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/erdma/erdma_cm.c > index f13f16479eca..63f314222813 100644 > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/erdma/erdma_cm.c > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/erdma/erdma_cm.c <...> > + trace_sk_data_ready(sk, __func__); <...> > + trace_sk_data_ready(sk, __func__); <...> > + trace_sk_data_ready(sk, __func__); <...> > + trace_sk_data_ready(sk, __func__); <...> > + trace_sk_data_ready(sk, __func__); <...> > + trace_sk_data_ready(sk, __func__); <...> > + trace_sk_data_ready(sk, __func__); <...> > + trace_sk_data_ready(sk, __func__); <...> > + trace_sk_data_ready(sk, __func__); <...> > + trace_sk_data_ready(sk, __func__); > pr_debug("Entering iscsi_target_sk_data_ready: conn: %p\n", conn); This can go. <...> > + trace_sk_data_ready(sock, __func__); <...> > + trace_sk_data_ready(sock, __func__); <...> > + trace_sk_data_ready(sk, __func__); <...> > + trace_sk_data_ready(sk, __func__); <...> > + trace_sk_data_ready(sk, __func__); <...> > + trace_sk_data_ready(sk, __func__); <...> __func__ repetitive pattern hints that it is not best API interface. > +TRACE_EVENT(sk_data_ready, > + > + TP_PROTO(const struct sock *sk, const char *func), > + > + TP_ARGS(sk, func), > + > + TP_STRUCT__entry( > + __field(const void *, skaddr) > + __field(__u16, family) > + __field(__u16, protocol) > + __string(func, func) TRACE_EVENT() is macro defined in .h file, you can safely put __func__ instead. > + ), > + > + TP_fast_assign( > + __entry->skaddr = sk; > + __entry->family = sk->sk_family; > + __entry->protocol = sk->sk_protocol; > + __assign_str(func, func) > + ), > + > + TP_printk("family=%u protocol=%u func=%s", > + __entry->family, __entry->protocol, __get_str(func)) > +); > + > #endif /* _TRACE_SOCK_H */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists