netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/3] selftests/bpf: Add connmark read test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:18:41 +0200
From:   Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To:     Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
Cc:     Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, pablo@...filter.org,
        fw@...len.de, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        andrii@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, ast@...nel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, memxor@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/3] selftests/bpf: Add connmark read test

Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz> wrote:
> > Warning: Extension CONNMARK revision 0 not supported, missing kernel module?
> >   iptables v1.8.8 (nf_tables): Could not fetch rule set generation id:
> > Invalid argument

Martin,

can you give result of

modinfo xt_CONNMARK
and
modinfo nft_compat?

I suspect your kernel lacks nf_tables support.

> >   iptables v1.8.8 (nf_tables): Could not fetch rule set generation id:
> > Invalid argument

Probably a kernel without nftables support?

> So perhaps iptables/nftables suffered a regression somewhere. I'll take
> a closer look tonight / tomorrow morning.

Possible but unlikely, all those tests pass for me.