netdev - Re: [PATCH ipsec v6] xfrm: replay: Fix ESN wrap around for GSO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Oct 2022 10:44:15 +0200
From:   Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:     Christian Langrock <christian.langrock@...unet.com>
CC:     <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec v6] xfrm: replay: Fix ESN wrap around for GSO

On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 04:50:15PM +0200, Christian Langrock wrote:
> When using GSO it can happen that the wrong seq_hi is used for the last
> packets before the wrap around. This can lead to double usage of a
> sequence number. To avoid this, we should serialize this last GSO
> packet.
> 
> Fixes: d7dbefc45cf5 ("xfrm: Add xfrm_replay_overflow functions for offloading")
> Co-developed-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Langrock <christian.langrock@...unet.com>
> ---
> Changes in v6:
>  - move overflow check to offloading path to avoid locking issues
> 
> Changes in v5:
>  - Fix build
> 
> Changes in v4:
>  - move changelog within comment
>  - add reviewer
> 
> Changes in v3:
> - fix build
> - remove wrapper function
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - switch to bool as return value
> - remove switch case in wrapper function
> ---
>  net/ipv4/esp4_offload.c |  3 +++
>  net/ipv6/esp6_offload.c |  3 +++
>  net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c  | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>  net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c  |  2 +-
>  4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Your patch does not apply to the ipsec tree. Looks
like it is malformed by your mailer.