netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 1/3] netlink: add support for formatted extack messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221013093228.607a9eee@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 13 Oct 2022 09:32:28 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:     edward.cree@....com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-net-drivers@....com, davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com,
        edumazet@...gle.com, habetsm.xilinx@...il.com,
        marcelo.leitner@...il.com, Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 1/3] netlink: add support for formatted
 extack messages

On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 18:16:47 +0200 Johannes Berg wrote:
> If you worry about the strings (and sizes) then you probably shouldn't
> advocate always having __FILE__ and __func__ ;-)

To be clear I meant to pass those as arguments to a common format
string. Are you saying just using them will bloat the binary?
Oh well, I guess :(