netdev - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 52/77] net: sfp: re-implement soft state polling setup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 13 Oct 2022 14:01:46 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, andrew@...n.ch,
        hkallweit1@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
        pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 52/77] net: sfp: re-implement soft state
 polling setup

On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 08:21:09AM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
>On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 06:07:29PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit 8475c4b70b040f9d8cbc308100f2c4d865f810b3 ]
>>
>> Re-implement the decision making for soft state polling. Instead of
>> generating the soft state mask in sfp_soft_start_poll() by looking at
>> which GPIOs are available, record their availability in
>> sfp_sm_mod_probe() in sfp->state_hw_mask.
>>
>> This will then allow us to clear bits in sfp->state_hw_mask in module
>> specific quirks when the hardware signals should not be used, thereby
>> allowing us to switch to using the software state polling.
>
>NAK.
>
>There is absolutely no point in stable picking up this commit. On its
>own, it doesn't do anything beneficial. It isn't a fix for anything.
>It isn't stable material.
>
>If you picked up the next two patches in the series, there would be a
>point to it - introducing support for the HALNy GPON SFP module, but
>as you didn't these three patches on their own are entirely pointless.

So why not tag those patches for stable to make it explicit?

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha