[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <PAXPR04MB9185777624723D0FE11C6E4689259@PAXPR04MB9185.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 19:24:02 +0000
From: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>
To: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] net: phylink: add phylink_set_mac_pm()
helper
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2022 11:07 AM
> To: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Eric Dumazet
> <edumazet@...gle.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Paolo Abeni
> <pabeni@...hat.com>; Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>;
> Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>; Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>;
> Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>; Alexandre Torgue
> <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>; Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com; linux-
> arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; imx@...ts.linux.dev
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] net: phylink: add phylink_set_mac_pm() helper
>
> Caution: EXT Email
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 08:39:02AM -0500, Shenwei Wang wrote:
> > Per Russell's suggestion, the implementation is changed from the
> > helper function to add an extra property in phylink_config structure
> > because this change can easily cover SFP usecase too.
>
> Which tree are you aiming this for - net-next or net?
>
The patch can be applied to both trees. You can select the one which is easy to
go ahead.
Thanks,
Shenwei
> You should use [PATCH net ...] or [PATCH net-next ...] to indicate which tree
> you're aiming these patches for.
>
> Please don't repost due to this unless you want it to go into the net tree, as net-
> next is currently closed.
>
> --
> RMK's Patch system:
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ar
> mlinux.org.uk%2Fdeveloper%2Fpatches%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cshenwei.
> wang%40nxp.com%7C9eb73c5218ab4ca2e25908daad350702%7C686ea1d3bc2
> b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C638012740506537030%7CUnknown%7
> CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJ
> XVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ZUtXNJ8wXqhi9Tvcg51uJJvcS
> 9CbJt6yxF3zjuoEfuQ%3D&reserved=0
> FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists