netdev - Re: WARN: multiple IDs found for 'nf_conn': 92168, 117897

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Oct 2022 00:12:39 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: WARN: multiple IDs found for 'nf_conn': 92168, 117897 - using
 92168

On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 08:05:17AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Oct 2022 22:07:57 +0200 Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > Yeah, it's there on linux-next, too.
> > > 
> > > Let me grab a fresh VM and try there. Maybe it's my system. Somehow.  
> > 
> > ok, I will look around what's the way to install that centos 8 thing
> 
> Any luck?

now BTFIDS warnings..

I can see following on centos8 with gcc 8.5:

	  BTFIDS  vmlinux
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'task_struct': 300, 56614 - using 300
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'file': 540, 56649 - using 540
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'vm_area_struct': 549, 56652 - using 549
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'seq_file': 953, 56690 - using 953
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'inode': 1132, 56966 - using 1132
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'path': 1164, 56995 - using 1164
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'task_struct': 300, 61905 - using 300
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'file': 540, 61943 - using 540
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'vm_area_struct': 549, 61946 - using 549
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'inode': 1132, 62029 - using 1132
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'path': 1164, 62058 - using 1164
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'cgroup': 1190, 62067 - using 1190
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'seq_file': 953, 62253 - using 953
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'sock': 7960, 62374 - using 7960
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'sk_buff': 1876, 62485 - using 1876
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'bpf_prog': 6094, 62542 - using 6094
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'socket': 7993, 62545 - using 7993
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'xdp_buff': 6191, 62836 - using 6191
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'sock_common': 8164, 63152 - using 8164
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'request_sock': 17296, 63204 - using 17296
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'inet_request_sock': 36292, 63222 - using 36292
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'inet_sock': 32700, 63225 - using 32700
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'inet_connection_sock': 33944, 63240 - using 33944
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'tcp_request_sock': 36299, 63260 - using 36299
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'tcp_sock': 33969, 63264 - using 33969
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'bpf_map': 6623, 63343 - using 6623

I'll need to check on that..

and I just actually saw the 'nf_conn' warning on linux-next/master with
latest fedora/gcc-12:

	  BTF [M] net/netfilter/nf_nat.ko
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'nf_conn': 106518, 120156 - using 106518
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'nf_conn': 106518, 121853 - using 106518
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'nf_conn': 106518, 123126 - using 106518
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'nf_conn': 106518, 124537 - using 106518
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'nf_conn': 106518, 126442 - using 106518
	WARN: multiple IDs found for 'nf_conn': 106518, 128256 - using 106518
	  LD [M]  net/netfilter/nf_nat_tftp.ko

looks like maybe dedup missed this struct for some reason

nf_conn dump from module:

	[120155] PTR '(anon)' type_id=120156
	[120156] STRUCT 'nf_conn' size=320 vlen=14
		'ct_general' type_id=105882 bits_offset=0
		'lock' type_id=180 bits_offset=64
		'timeout' type_id=113 bits_offset=640
		'zone' type_id=106520 bits_offset=672
		'tuplehash' type_id=106533 bits_offset=704
		'status' type_id=1 bits_offset=1600
		'ct_net' type_id=3215 bits_offset=1664
		'nat_bysource' type_id=139 bits_offset=1728
		'__nfct_init_offset' type_id=949 bits_offset=1856
		'master' type_id=120155 bits_offset=1856
		'mark' type_id=106351 bits_offset=1920
		'secmark' type_id=106351 bits_offset=1952
		'ext' type_id=106536 bits_offset=1984
		'proto' type_id=106532 bits_offset=2048

nf_conn dump from vmlinux:

	[106517] PTR '(anon)' type_id=106518
	[106518] STRUCT 'nf_conn' size=320 vlen=14
		'ct_general' type_id=105882 bits_offset=0
		'lock' type_id=180 bits_offset=64
		'timeout' type_id=113 bits_offset=640
		'zone' type_id=106520 bits_offset=672
		'tuplehash' type_id=106533 bits_offset=704
		'status' type_id=1 bits_offset=1600
		'ct_net' type_id=3215 bits_offset=1664
		'nat_bysource' type_id=139 bits_offset=1728
		'__nfct_init_offset' type_id=949 bits_offset=1856
		'master' type_id=106517 bits_offset=1856
		'mark' type_id=106351 bits_offset=1920
		'secmark' type_id=106351 bits_offset=1952
		'ext' type_id=106536 bits_offset=1984
		'proto' type_id=106532 bits_offset=2048

look identical.. Andrii, any idea?

thanks,
jirka