[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y0gHa99Z70TkKtR5@shredder>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 15:41:15 +0300
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
To: "Hans J. Schultz" <netdev@...io-technology.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Yuwei Wang <wangyuweihx@...il.com>,
Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>,
Florent Fourcot <florent.fourcot@...irst.fr>,
Hans Schultz <schultz.hans@...il.com>,
Joachim Wiberg <troglobit@...il.com>,
Amit Cohen <amcohen@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 1/9] net: bridge: add locked entry fdb flag
to extend locked port feature
On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 07:40:44PM +0200, Hans J. Schultz wrote:
> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> index 74864dc46a7e..8008ceb45605 100644
> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> @@ -4035,6 +4035,7 @@ int ndo_dflt_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm,
> const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid,
> u16 flags)
> {
> + __u32 ext_flags = 0;
> int err = -EINVAL;
>
> /* If aging addresses are supported device will need to
> @@ -4050,6 +4051,14 @@ int ndo_dflt_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm,
> return err;
> }
>
> + if (tb[NDA_FLAGS_EXT])
> + ext_flags = nla_get_u32(tb[NDA_FLAGS_EXT]);
> +
> + if (ext_flags & NTF_EXT_LOCKED) {
> + netdev_info(dev, "invalid flags given to default FDB implementation\n");
> + return err;
> + }
I'm not sure it makes sense to deny specific flags in this case. It
might be better to just error out if NDA_FLAGS_EXT was specified.
> +
> if (is_unicast_ether_addr(addr) || is_link_local_ether_addr(addr))
> err = dev_uc_add_excl(dev, addr);
> else if (is_multicast_ether_addr(addr))
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists