[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <ef551fa7819a9ed3795941cca5a42f932a800d3a.1665416630.git.sd@queasysnail.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 16:15:40 +0200
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
Subject: [PATCH net 2/5] macsec: delete new rxsc when offload fails
Currently we get an inconsistent state:
- netlink returns the error to userspace
- the RXSC is installed but not offloaded
Then the device could get confused when we try to add an RXSA, because
the RXSC isn't supposed to exist.
Fixes: 3cf3227a21d1 ("net: macsec: hardware offloading infrastructure")
Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
---
drivers/net/macsec.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/macsec.c b/drivers/net/macsec.c
index b3f76e8071f2..0d6fe34b91ae 100644
--- a/drivers/net/macsec.c
+++ b/drivers/net/macsec.c
@@ -1876,7 +1876,6 @@ static int macsec_add_rxsc(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
struct macsec_rx_sc *rx_sc;
struct nlattr *tb_rxsc[MACSEC_RXSC_ATTR_MAX + 1];
struct macsec_secy *secy;
- bool was_active;
int ret;
if (!attrs[MACSEC_ATTR_IFINDEX])
@@ -1904,7 +1903,6 @@ static int macsec_add_rxsc(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
return PTR_ERR(rx_sc);
}
- was_active = rx_sc->active;
if (tb_rxsc[MACSEC_RXSC_ATTR_ACTIVE])
rx_sc->active = !!nla_get_u8(tb_rxsc[MACSEC_RXSC_ATTR_ACTIVE]);
@@ -1931,7 +1929,8 @@ static int macsec_add_rxsc(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
return 0;
cleanup:
- rx_sc->active = was_active;
+ del_rx_sc(secy, sci);
+ free_rx_sc(rx_sc);
rtnl_unlock();
return ret;
}
--
2.38.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists