netdev - Re: [PATCH net 3/5] macsec: fix secy->n_rx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y0kTLaz95PUE4uQz@hog>
Date:   Fri, 14 Oct 2022 09:43:41 +0200
From:   Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/5] macsec: fix secy->n_rx_sc accounting

2022-10-14, 09:16:56 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
[...]
> > @@ -1897,15 +1899,16 @@ static int macsec_add_rxsc(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> >  	secy = &macsec_priv(dev)->secy;
> >  	sci = nla_get_sci(tb_rxsc[MACSEC_RXSC_ATTR_SCI]);
> >  
> > -	rx_sc = create_rx_sc(dev, sci);
> > +
> > +	if (tb_rxsc[MACSEC_RXSC_ATTR_ACTIVE])
> > +		active = !!nla_get_u8(tb_rxsc[MACSEC_RXSC_ATTR_ACTIVE]);
> 
> You don't need !! to assign to bool variables and can safely omit them.

Yeah, but I'm just moving existing code, see below.

(please trim your replies, nobody wants to scroll through endless
quoting just to find one comment hiding in the middle)

> 
> thanks
> 
> > +
> > +	rx_sc = create_rx_sc(dev, sci, active);
> >  	if (IS_ERR(rx_sc)) {
> >  		rtnl_unlock();
> >  		return PTR_ERR(rx_sc);
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	if (tb_rxsc[MACSEC_RXSC_ATTR_ACTIVE])
> > -		rx_sc->active = !!nla_get_u8(tb_rxsc[MACSEC_RXSC_ATTR_ACTIVE]);

-- 
Sabrina