[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <634b1304.c80a0220.cedc6.e007@mx.google.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2022 13:07:29 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: edumazet@...gle.com
Cc: cong.wang@...edance.com, davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org,
kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, peilin.ye@...edance.com,
yepeilin.cs@...il.com, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/sock: Introduce trace_sk_data_ready()
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 09:19:34AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Second patch adding the tracing point once in the helper ?
>
> Alternatively, why not add the tracepoint directly in the called
> functions (we have few of them),
> instead of all call points ?
Why do we want to give implementations of sk_data_ready() freedom
to not to call this trace_sk_data_ready()?
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists