[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y06RzWQnTw2RJGPr@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 04:45:17 -0700
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Muhammad Husaini Zulkifli <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...osl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
aravindhan.gunasekaran@...el.com, gal@...dia.com, saeed@...nel.org,
leon@...nel.org, michael.chan@...adcom.com, andy@...yhouse.net,
vinicius.gomes@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Add support for DMA timestamp for non-PTP packets
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 09:07:28AM +0800, Muhammad Husaini Zulkifli wrote:
> With these additional socket options, users can continue to utilise
> HW timestamps for PTP while specifying non-PTP packets to use DMA
> timestamps if the NIC can support them.
What is the use case for reporting DMA transmit time?
How is this better than using SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE ?
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists