lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y06RzWQnTw2RJGPr@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date:   Tue, 18 Oct 2022 04:45:17 -0700
From:   Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:     Muhammad Husaini Zulkifli <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com>
Cc:     intel-wired-lan@...osl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
        aravindhan.gunasekaran@...el.com, gal@...dia.com, saeed@...nel.org,
        leon@...nel.org, michael.chan@...adcom.com, andy@...yhouse.net,
        vinicius.gomes@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Add support for DMA timestamp for non-PTP packets

On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 09:07:28AM +0800, Muhammad Husaini Zulkifli wrote:

> With these additional socket options, users can continue to utilise
> HW timestamps for PTP while specifying non-PTP packets to use DMA
> timestamps if the NIC can support them.

What is the use case for reporting DMA transmit time?

How is this better than using SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE ?


Thanks,
Richard

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ