netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] sched, net: NUMA-aware CPU spreading interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <07a034cf-507a-e4ad-d78c-e5dd5a8d98b5@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Oct 2022 09:36:44 +0300
From:   Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>
To:     Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
        Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] sched, net: NUMA-aware CPU spreading interface


On 9/23/2022 4:25 PM, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> Tariq pointed out in [1] that drivers allocating IRQ vectors would benefit
> from having smarter NUMA-awareness (cpumask_local_spread() doesn't quite cut
> it).
> 
> The proposed interface involved an array of CPUs and a temporary cpumask, and
> being my difficult self what I'm proposing here is an interface that doesn't
> require any temporary storage other than some stack variables (at the cost of
> one wild macro).
> 
> Please note that this is based on top of Yury's bitmap-for-next [2] to leverage
> his fancy new FIND_NEXT_BIT() macro.
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220728191203.4055-1-tariqt@nvidia.com/
> [2]: https://github.com/norov/linux.git/ -b bitmap-for-next
> 
> A note on treewide use of for_each_cpu_andnot()
> ===============================================
> 
> I've used the below coccinelle script to find places that could be patched (I
> couldn't figure out the valid syntax to patch from coccinelle itself):
> 
> ,-----
> @tmpandnot@
> expression tmpmask;
> iterator for_each_cpu;
> position p;
> statement S;
> @@
> cpumask_andnot(tmpmask, ...);
> 
> ...
> 
> (
> for_each_cpu@p(..., tmpmask, ...)
> 	S
> |
> for_each_cpu@p(..., tmpmask, ...)
> {
> 	...
> }
> )
> 
> @script:python depends on tmpandnot@
> p << tmpandnot.p;
> @@
> coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "andnot loop here")
> '-----
> 
> Which yields (against c40e8341e3b3):
> 
> .//arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:1587:1-13: andnot loop here
> .//arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:1530:1-13: andnot loop here
> .//arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:1440:1-13: andnot loop here
> .//arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/subcore.c:306:2-14: andnot loop here
> .//arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_cluster.c:62:1-13: andnot loop here
> .//drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c:110:1-13: andnot loop here
> .//drivers/cpufreq/armada-8k-cpufreq.c:148:1-13: andnot loop here
> .//drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:931:1-13: andnot loop here
> .//drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_channels.c:73:1-13: andnot loop here
> .//drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/siena/efx_channels.c:73:1-13: andnot loop here
> .//kernel/sched/core.c:345:1-13: andnot loop here
> .//kernel/sched/core.c:366:1-13: andnot loop here
> .//net/core/dev.c:3058:1-13: andnot loop here
> 
> A lot of those are actually of the shape
> 
>    for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
>        ...
>        cpumask_andnot(mask, ...);
>    }
> 
> I think *some* of the powerpc ones would be a match for for_each_cpu_andnot(),
> but I decided to just stick to the one obvious one in __sched_core_flip().
>    
> Revisions
> =========
> 
> v3 -> v4
> ++++++++
> 
> o Rebased on top of Yury's bitmap-for-next
> o Added Tariq's mlx5e patch
> o Made sched_numa_hop_mask() return cpu_online_mask for the NUMA_NO_NODE &&
>    hops=0 case
> 
> v2 -> v3
> ++++++++
> 
> o Added for_each_cpu_and() and for_each_cpu_andnot() tests (Yury)
> o New patches to fix issues raised by running the above
> 
> o New patch to use for_each_cpu_andnot() in sched/core.c (Yury)
> 
> v1 -> v2
> ++++++++
> 
> o Split _find_next_bit() @invert into @invert1 and @invert2 (Yury)
> o Rebase onto v6.0-rc1
> 
> Cheers,
> Valentin
> 

Hi,

What's the status of this?
Do we have agreement on the changes needed for the next respin?

Regards,
Tariq