[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1ol981-00EDSj-FZ@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 14:29:01 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 4/7] net: sfp: ignore power level 3 prior to SFF-8472
Rev 11.4
Power level 3 was included in SFF-8472 revision 11.9, but this does
not have a compliance code. Use revision 11.4 as the minimum
compliance level instead.
This should avoid any spurious indication of 2W modules.
Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
---
drivers/net/phy/sfp.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
index a7635b02524a..af676e28ba6a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
@@ -1764,7 +1764,9 @@ static int sfp_module_parse_power(struct sfp *sfp)
if (sfp->id.ext.sff8472_compliance >= SFP_SFF8472_COMPLIANCE_REV10_2 &&
sfp->id.ext.options & cpu_to_be16(SFP_OPTIONS_POWER_DECL))
power_mW = 1500;
- if (sfp->id.ext.options & cpu_to_be16(SFP_OPTIONS_HIGH_POWER_LEVEL))
+ /* Added in Rev 11.9, but there is no compliance code for this */
+ if (sfp->id.ext.sff8472_compliance >= SFP_SFF8472_COMPLIANCE_REV11_4 &&
+ sfp->id.ext.options & cpu_to_be16(SFP_OPTIONS_HIGH_POWER_LEVEL))
power_mW = 2000;
/* Power level 1 modules (max. 1W) are always supported. */
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists