netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 12/13] genetlink: allow families to use split ops directly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Oct 2022 10:15:05 +0200
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
        jiri@...nulli.us, razor@...ckwall.org, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
        gnault@...hat.com, jacob.e.keller@...el.com, fw@...len.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 12/13] genetlink: allow families to use split
 ops directly

On Tue, 2022-10-18 at 16:07 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Let families to hook in the new split ops.
> 
> They are more flexible and should note be much larger than

"note" -> "not"

> full ops. Each split op is 40B while full op is 48B.
> Devlink for example has 54 dos and 19 dumps, 2 of the dumps
> do not have a do -> 56 full commands = 2688B.
> Split ops would have taken 2920B, so 9% more space while
> allowing individual per/post doit and per-type policies.

You mean "Full ops would have [...] while split ops allow individual
[...]" or so?

johannes