[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKn0bn4nnzXXyZEVv9ZsFA6UXpV2SDHW7nkncH3Z3tsKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 09:27:44 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/7] dt-bindings: net: sff,sfp: update binding
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 9:19 AM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 09:28:25AM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 06:31:53PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 14:28:46 +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > > > Add a minimum and default for the maximum-power-milliwatt option;
> > > > module power levels were originally up to 1W, so this is the default
> > > > and the minimum power level we can have for a functional SFP cage.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> > > > ---
> > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sff,sfp.yaml | 2 ++
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > >
> > > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> > > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> > >
> > > yamllint warnings/errors:
> > >
> > > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> > > /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sff,sfp.yaml: properties:maximum-power-milliwatt: 'minimum' should not be valid under {'enum': ['const', 'enum', 'exclusiveMaximum', 'exclusiveMinimum', 'minimum', 'maximum', 'multipleOf', 'pattern']}
> > > hint: Scalar and array keywords cannot be mixed
> > > from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/keywords.yaml#
> >
> > I'm reading that error message and it means absolutely nothing to me.
> > Please can you explain it (and also re-word it to be clearer)?
>
> 'maxItems' is a constraint for arrays. 'maximum' is a constraint for
> scalar values. Mixing them does not make sense.
TBC, dropping 'maxItems' is what is needed here.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists