[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9c71f2f1-b3d0-cc82-3d62-afd72a92d94d@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 10:33:40 -0400
From: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@...hat.com>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tipc: fix a null-ptr-deref in tipc_topsrv_accept
On 10/18/22 15:19, Xin Long wrote:
> syzbot found a crash in tipc_topsrv_accept:
>
> KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000008-0x000000000000000f]
> Workqueue: tipc_rcv tipc_topsrv_accept
> RIP: 0010:kernel_accept+0x22d/0x350 net/socket.c:3487
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> tipc_topsrv_accept+0x197/0x280 net/tipc/topsrv.c:460
> process_one_work+0x991/0x1610 kernel/workqueue.c:2289
> worker_thread+0x665/0x1080 kernel/workqueue.c:2436
> kthread+0x2e4/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:376
> ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:306
>
> It was caused by srv->listener that might be set to null by
> tipc_topsrv_stop() in net .exit whereas it's still used in
> tipc_topsrv_accept() worker.
>
> srv->listener is protected by srv->idr_lock in tipc_topsrv_stop(), so add
> a check for srv->listener under srv->idr_lock in tipc_topsrv_accept() to
> avoid the null-ptr-deref. To ensure the lsock is not released during the
> tipc_topsrv_accept(), move sock_release() after tipc_topsrv_work_stop()
> where it's waiting until the tipc_topsrv_accept worker to be done.
>
> Note that sk_callback_lock is used to protect sk->sk_user_data instead of
> srv->listener, and it should check srv in tipc_topsrv_listener_data_ready()
> instead. This also ensures that no more tipc_topsrv_accept worker will be
> started after tipc_conn_close() is called in tipc_topsrv_stop() where it
> sets sk->sk_user_data to null.
>
> Fixes: 0ef897be12b8 ("tipc: separate topology server listener socket from subcsriber sockets")
> Reported-by: syzbot+c5ce866a8d30f4be0651@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
> ---
> net/tipc/topsrv.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/tipc/topsrv.c b/net/tipc/topsrv.c
> index 14fd05fd6107..d92ec92f0b71 100644
> --- a/net/tipc/topsrv.c
> +++ b/net/tipc/topsrv.c
> @@ -450,12 +450,19 @@ static void tipc_conn_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
> static void tipc_topsrv_accept(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> struct tipc_topsrv *srv = container_of(work, struct tipc_topsrv, awork);
> - struct socket *lsock = srv->listener;
> - struct socket *newsock;
> + struct socket *newsock, *lsock;
> struct tipc_conn *con;
> struct sock *newsk;
> int ret;
>
> + spin_lock_bh(&srv->idr_lock);
> + if (!srv->listener) {
> + spin_unlock_bh(&srv->idr_lock);
> + return;
> + }
> + lsock = srv->listener;
> + spin_unlock_bh(&srv->idr_lock);
> +
> while (1) {
> ret = kernel_accept(lsock, &newsock, O_NONBLOCK);
> if (ret < 0)
> @@ -489,7 +496,7 @@ static void tipc_topsrv_listener_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
>
> read_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
> srv = sk->sk_user_data;
> - if (srv->listener)
> + if (srv)
> queue_work(srv->rcv_wq, &srv->awork);
> read_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
> }
> @@ -699,8 +706,9 @@ static void tipc_topsrv_stop(struct net *net)
> __module_get(lsock->sk->sk_prot_creator->owner);
> srv->listener = NULL;
> spin_unlock_bh(&srv->idr_lock);
> - sock_release(lsock);
> +
> tipc_topsrv_work_stop(srv);
> + sock_release(lsock);
> idr_destroy(&srv->conn_idr);
> kfree(srv);
> }
Acked-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists