[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y1KVLAR2Qi6JeSBj@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:48:44 -0700
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: "Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini" <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com>
Cc: "intel-wired-lan@...osl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...osl.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"Gunasekaran, Aravindhan" <aravindhan.gunasekaran@...el.com>,
"gal@...dia.com" <gal@...dia.com>,
"saeed@...nel.org" <saeed@...nel.org>,
"leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>,
"michael.chan@...adcom.com" <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
"andy@...yhouse.net" <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"Gomes, Vinicius" <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Add support for DMA timestamp for non-PTP packets
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 12:25:13AM +0000, Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini wrote:
> Sorry for misinterpreting SOFTWARE as HARDWARE in my previous reply.
> DMA Timestamping is definitely better than SOFTWARE timestamp because
> we sample the time at the controller MAC level.
Do you have numbers to back up this claim?
> Could you please provide additional details about this? What do you meant by
> offering 1 HW Timestamp with many SW timestamps?
- Let the PTP stack use hardware time stamps.
- Let all other applications use software time stamps.
Hm?
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists