[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <trinity-e60759de-3f0f-4b1e-bc0f-b33c4f8ac201-1666374467573@3c-app-gmx-bap55>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 19:47:47 +0200
From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Frank Wunderlich <linux@...web.de>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Alexander Couzens <lynxis@...0.eu>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Aw: Re: [PATCH v2] net: mtk_sgmii: implement mtk_pcs_ops
> Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Oktober 2022 um 11:06 Uhr
> Von: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
> An: "Frank Wunderlich" <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 08:04:51AM +0200, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> > I have no register documentation to check if there is any way to read out pause/duplex setting. Maybe MTK can answer this or extend function later.
>
> I suspect we can probably guess.
>
> Looking at SGMSYS_PCS_CONTROL_1, this is actually the standard BMCR in
> the low 16 bits, and BMSR in the upper 16 bits, so:
>
> At address 4, I'd expect the PHYSID.
> At address 8, I'd expect the advertisement register in the low 16 bits
> and the link partner advertisement in the upper 16 bits.
>
> Can you try an experiment, and in mtk_sgmii_init() try accessing the
> regmap at address 0, 4, and 8 and print their contents please?
is this what you want to see?
int mtk_sgmii_init(struct mtk_sgmii *ss, struct device_node *r, u32 ana_rgc3)
{
struct device_node *np;
+ unsigned int val;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < MTK_MAX_DEVS; i++) {
@@ -158,6 +159,12 @@ int mtk_sgmii_init(struct mtk_sgmii *ss, struct device_node *r, u32 ana_rgc3)
if (IS_ERR(ss->pcs[i].regmap))
return PTR_ERR(ss->pcs[i].regmap);
+ regmap_read(ss->pcs[i].regmap, SGMSYS_PCS_CONTROL_1, &val);
+ printk(KERN_ALERT "dev: %d offset:0 0x%x",i,val);
+ regmap_read(ss->pcs[i].regmap, SGMSYS_PCS_CONTROL_1+4, &val);
+ printk(KERN_ALERT "dev: %d offset:4 0x%x",i,val);
+ regmap_read(ss->pcs[i].regmap, SGMSYS_PCS_CONTROL_1+8, &val);
+ printk(KERN_ALERT "dev: %d offset:8 0x%x",i,val);
ss->pcs[i].pcs.ops = &mtk_pcs_ops;
}
[ 1.083359] dev: 0 offset:0 0x840140
[ 1.083376] dev: 0 offset:4 0x4d544950
[ 1.086955] dev: 0 offset:8 0x1
[ 1.090697] dev: 1 offset:0 0x81140
[ 1.093866] dev: 1 offset:4 0x4d544950
[ 1.097342] dev: 1 offset:8 0x1
> --
> RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
>
regards Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists