netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: phy: micrel: Add PHY Auto/MDI/MDI-X set driver for KSZ9131

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 21 Oct 2022 15:56:36 +0530
From:   Raju Lakkaraju <Raju.Lakkaraju@...rochip.com>
To:     Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <bryan.whitehead@...rochip.com>,
        <hkallweit1@...il.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        <linux@...linux.org.uk>, <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        <andrew@...n.ch>, <Ian.Saturley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: phy: micrel: Add PHY Auto/MDI/MDI-X
 set driver for KSZ9131

Hi Horatiu,

Thank you for review comments.

The 10/21/2022 09:27, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> The 10/21/2022 11:26, Raju Lakkaraju wrote:
> 
> Hi Raju,
> 
> > Add support for MDI-X status and configuration for KSZ9131 chips
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Raju Lakkaraju <Raju.Lakkaraju@...rochip.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/phy/micrel.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 77 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> > index 54a17b576eac..40aa52d442f8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/micrel.c
> > @@ -1295,6 +1295,81 @@ static int ksz9131_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +#define MII_KSZPHY_AUTO_MDIX		0x1C
> > +#define MII_KSZPHY_AUTO_MDI_SET_	BIT(7)
> > +#define MII_KSZPHY_AUTO_MDIX_SWAP_OFF_	BIT(6)
> 
> Can you please drop the "_" from the end of the macros. The only
> macros that have that suffix are those used by PTP.

Ok. I will remove '_' 

> 
> Are these KSZPHY registers generic for all KSZ phys? Then the functions

No. 
MDI-X register address is different for KSZ PHYs (Micerl PHYs)
KSZ8081 PHY MDI-X configuration register is 0x1f
KSZ886X PHY MDI-X configuration register is 0x00
KSZ9131 PHY MDI-X configuration register is 0x1c
 
.

> 'ksz9131_mdix_update' and 'ksz9131_config_mdix' shouldn't be rename to
> something like 'kszphy_mdix_update' and 'kszphy_config_mdix'?

No.
ksz9131_mdix_* specific to KSZ 9131 PHYs

> Otherwise shoudln't these register contain 9131 in their name?

Ok. I will add '9131' label in micro definitionis

> 
> I know that also lan8841 and lan8804 have the same layout for these
> registers.

O.k.

> 
> > +
> > +static int ksz9131_mdix_update(struct phy_device *phydev)
> > +{
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = phy_read(phydev, MII_KSZPHY_AUTO_MDIX);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	if (ret & MII_KSZPHY_AUTO_MDIX_SWAP_OFF_) {
> > +		if (ret & MII_KSZPHY_AUTO_MDI_SET_)
> > +			phydev->mdix_ctrl = ETH_TP_MDI;
> > +		else
> > +			phydev->mdix_ctrl = ETH_TP_MDI_X;
> > +	} else {
> > +		phydev->mdix_ctrl = ETH_TP_MDI_AUTO;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (ret & MII_KSZPHY_AUTO_MDI_SET_)
> > +		phydev->mdix = ETH_TP_MDI;
> > +	else
> > +		phydev->mdix = ETH_TP_MDI_X;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ksz9131_config_mdix(struct phy_device *phydev, u8 ctrl)
> > +{
> > +	u16 val;
> > +
> > +	switch (ctrl) {
> > +	case ETH_TP_MDI:
> > +		val = MII_KSZPHY_AUTO_MDIX_SWAP_OFF_ |
> > +		      MII_KSZPHY_AUTO_MDI_SET_;
> > +		break;
> > +	case ETH_TP_MDI_X:
> > +		val = MII_KSZPHY_AUTO_MDIX_SWAP_OFF_;
> > +		break;
> > +	case ETH_TP_MDI_AUTO:
> > +		val = 0;
> > +		break;
> > +	default:
> > +		return 0;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return phy_modify(phydev, MII_KSZPHY_AUTO_MDIX,
> > +			  MII_KSZPHY_AUTO_MDIX_SWAP_OFF_ |
> > +			  MII_KSZPHY_AUTO_MDI_SET_, val);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ksz9131_read_status(struct phy_device *phydev)
> > +{
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = ksz9131_mdix_update(phydev);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	return genphy_read_status(phydev);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ksz9131_config_aneg(struct phy_device *phydev)
> > +{
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = genphy_config_aneg(phydev);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	return ksz9131_config_mdix(phydev, phydev->mdix_ctrl);
> > +}
> > +
> >  #define KSZ8873MLL_GLOBAL_CONTROL_4	0x06
> >  #define KSZ8873MLL_GLOBAL_CONTROL_4_DUPLEX	BIT(6)
> >  #define KSZ8873MLL_GLOBAL_CONTROL_4_SPEED	BIT(4)
> > @@ -3304,6 +3379,8 @@ static struct phy_driver ksphy_driver[] = {
> >  	.probe		= kszphy_probe,
> >  	.config_init	= ksz9131_config_init,
> >  	.config_intr	= kszphy_config_intr,
> > +	.config_aneg	= ksz9131_config_aneg,
> > +	.read_status	= ksz9131_read_status,
> >  	.handle_interrupt = kszphy_handle_interrupt,
> >  	.get_sset_count = kszphy_get_sset_count,
> >  	.get_strings	= kszphy_get_strings,
> > -- 
> > 2.25.1
> > 
> 
> -- 
> /Horatiu

--------
Thanks,
Raju