lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 21:52:56 -0400 From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com> To: eike-kernel@...tec.de Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][Resend] rhashtable: make test actually random Hi, On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 9:47 AM Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@...tec.de> wrote: > > The "random rhlist add/delete operations" actually wasn't very random, as all > cases tested the same bit. Since the later parts of this loop depend on the > first case execute this unconditionally, and then test on different bits for the > remaining tests. While at it only request as much random bits as are actually > used. Seems reasonable to me. If it's okay with Thomas, who you CC'd, I'd like to take this through my random tree, as that'll prevent it from conflicting with a series I have out currently: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221022014403.3881893-1-Jason@zx2c4.com/ Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists