netdev - [net-next 06/14] net/mlx5: DR, Initialize chunk's ste

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 24 Oct 2022 14:57:26 +0100
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc:     Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
        Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@...dia.com>,
        Alex Vesker <valex@...dia.com>
Subject: [net-next 06/14] net/mlx5: DR, Initialize chunk's ste_arrays at chunk creation

From: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@...dia.com>

Rather than cleaning the corresponding chunk's section of ste_arrays on
chunk deletion, initialize these areas upon chunk creation.

Chunk destruction tend to come in large batches (during pool syncing).
To reduce the "hiccup" in such cases, moving ste_arrays init from chunk
destruction to initialization.

Signed-off-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Vesker <valex@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
---
 .../mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_icm_pool.c | 25 +++----------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_icm_pool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_icm_pool.c
index 4cdc9e9a54e1..7ca1ef073f55 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_icm_pool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_icm_pool.c
@@ -177,42 +177,25 @@ static int dr_icm_buddy_get_ste_size(struct mlx5dr_icm_buddy_mem *buddy)
 
 static void dr_icm_chunk_ste_init(struct mlx5dr_icm_chunk *chunk, int offset)
 {
+	int num_of_entries = mlx5dr_icm_pool_get_chunk_num_of_entries(chunk);
 	struct mlx5dr_icm_buddy_mem *buddy = chunk->buddy_mem;
+	int ste_size = dr_icm_buddy_get_ste_size(buddy);
 	int index = offset / DR_STE_SIZE;
 
 	chunk->ste_arr = &buddy->ste_arr[index];
 	chunk->miss_list = &buddy->miss_list[index];
-	chunk->hw_ste_arr = buddy->hw_ste_arr +
-			    index * dr_icm_buddy_get_ste_size(buddy);
-}
-
-static void dr_icm_chunk_ste_cleanup(struct mlx5dr_icm_chunk *chunk)
-{
-	int num_of_entries = mlx5dr_icm_pool_get_chunk_num_of_entries(chunk);
-	struct mlx5dr_icm_buddy_mem *buddy = chunk->buddy_mem;
+	chunk->hw_ste_arr = buddy->hw_ste_arr + index * ste_size;
 
-	memset(chunk->hw_ste_arr, 0,
-	       num_of_entries * dr_icm_buddy_get_ste_size(buddy));
+	memset(chunk->hw_ste_arr, 0, num_of_entries * ste_size);
 	memset(chunk->ste_arr, 0,
 	       num_of_entries * sizeof(chunk->ste_arr[0]));
 }
 
-static enum mlx5dr_icm_type
-get_chunk_icm_type(struct mlx5dr_icm_chunk *chunk)
-{
-	return chunk->buddy_mem->pool->icm_type;
-}
-
 static void dr_icm_chunk_destroy(struct mlx5dr_icm_chunk *chunk)
 {
-	enum mlx5dr_icm_type icm_type = get_chunk_icm_type(chunk);
-
 	chunk->buddy_mem->used_memory -= mlx5dr_icm_pool_get_chunk_byte_size(chunk);
 	list_del(&chunk->chunk_list);
 
-	if (icm_type == DR_ICM_TYPE_STE)
-		dr_icm_chunk_ste_cleanup(chunk);
-
 	kvfree(chunk);
 }
 
-- 
2.37.3