[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdV8MmTMMPnCGgXbZZ-gb4CVduAUBBG3BdAecBrc3J7RLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 16:59:17 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: biju.das.jz@...renesas.com
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
Stefan Mätje <stefan.maetje@....eu>,
Ulrich Hecht <uli+renesas@...nd.eu>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] can: rcar_canfd: Add has_gerfl_eef to struct rcar_canfd_hw_info
Hi Biju,
On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 1:03 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com> wrote:
> R-Car has ECC error flags in global error interrupts whereas it is
> not available on RZ/G2L.
>
> Add has_gerfl_eef to struct rcar_canfd_hw_info so that rcar_canfd_
> global_error() will process ECC errors only for R-Car.
>
> whilst, this patch fixes the below checkpatch warnings
> CHECK: Unnecessary parentheses around 'ch == 0'
> CHECK: Unnecessary parentheses around 'ch == 1'
>
> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Thanks for your patch!
> --- a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
> @@ -523,6 +523,7 @@ struct rcar_canfd_hw_info {
> unsigned multi_global_irqs:1; /* Has multiple global irqs */
> unsigned clk_postdiv:1; /* Has CAN clk post divider */
> unsigned multi_channel_irqs:1; /* Has multiple channel irqs */
> + unsigned has_gerfl_eef:1; /* Has ECC Error Flag */
Do you really need this flag? According to the RZ/G2L docs, the
corresponding register bits are always read as zero.
> };
>
> /* Channel priv data */
> @@ -947,17 +950,18 @@ static void rcar_canfd_global_error(struct net_device *ndev)
> {
> struct rcar_canfd_channel *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv = priv->gpriv;
> + const struct rcar_canfd_hw_info *info = gpriv->info;
> struct net_device_stats *stats = &ndev->stats;
> u32 ch = priv->channel;
> u32 gerfl, sts;
> u32 ridx = ch + RCANFD_RFFIFO_IDX;
>
> gerfl = rcar_canfd_read(priv->base, RCANFD_GERFL);
> - if ((gerfl & RCANFD_GERFL_EEF0) && (ch == 0)) {
> + if (info->has_gerfl_eef && (gerfl & RCANFD_GERFL_EEF0) && ch == 0) {
> netdev_dbg(ndev, "Ch0: ECC Error flag\n");
> stats->tx_dropped++;
> }
> - if ((gerfl & RCANFD_GERFL_EEF1) && (ch == 1)) {
> + if (info->has_gerfl_eef && (gerfl & RCANFD_GERFL_EEF1) && ch == 1) {
> netdev_dbg(ndev, "Ch1: ECC Error flag\n");
> stats->tx_dropped++;
> }
Just wrap both checks inside a single "if (gpriv->info->has_gerfl) { ... }"?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists