lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20221024100801.6c391ff9@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 10:08:01 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> To: netdev@...io-technology.com Cc: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>, Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>, DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>, Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>, Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Yuwei Wang <wangyuweihx@...il.com>, Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>, Florent Fourcot <florent.fourcot@...irst.fr>, Hans Schultz <schultz.hans@...il.com>, Joachim Wiberg <troglobit@...il.com>, Amit Cohen <amcohen@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 net-next 02/12] net: bridge: add blackhole fdb entry flag On Sun, 23 Oct 2022 07:32:02 +0200 netdev@...io-technology.com wrote: > >> @@ -1140,7 +1148,7 @@ static int __br_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm, > >> struct net_bridge *br, > >> err = br_fdb_external_learn_add(br, p, addr, vid, true); > >> } else { > >> spin_lock_bh(&br->hash_lock); > >> - err = fdb_add_entry(br, p, addr, ndm, nlh_flags, vid, nfea_tb); > >> + err = fdb_add_entry(br, p, addr, ndm, nlh_flags, vid, ext_flags, > >> nfea_tb); > > > > I believe the preference is to wrap to 80 columns when possible. > > Very strange... since I ran checkpatch.pl from the net-next kernel > itself and it did not > give me any warnings about 80 columns, but rather said 'patch is ready > for submission'. > > As this is silent, could it be some missing python plugins or something > to do with perl? I run: ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict --max-line-length=80
Powered by blists - more mailing lists