lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Y1bBrB3mps1+BBX8@unreal> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 19:47:40 +0300 From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> To: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org> Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] net/mlx5e: Support devlink reload of IPsec core On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 03:17:14PM +0100, Saeed Mahameed wrote: > On 23 Oct 20:22, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com> > > > > Change IPsec initialization flow to allow future creation of hardware > > resources that should be released and allocated during devlink reload > > operation. As part of that change, update function signature to be > > void as no callers are actually interested in it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com> > > --- > > .../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c | 17 ++++++++--------- > > .../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.h | 5 ++--- > > .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c | 8 +++----- > > .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c | 13 +++++++------ > > 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) <...> > > + > > unrelated change. I will fix it. > > > mlx5e_destroy_mdev_resources(mdev); > > return 0; > > } > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c <...> > > static int mlx5e_create_rep_ttc_table(struct mlx5e_priv *priv) > > @@ -1074,6 +1068,8 @@ static void mlx5e_rep_enable(struct mlx5e_priv *priv) > > { > > struct mlx5e_rep_priv *rpriv = priv->ppriv; > > > > + mlx5e_ipsec_init(priv); > > + > > we don't want ipsec for vport representors, only uplink. The FW will miss relevant IPsec caps for uplink, but ok, will remove. Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists