netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] devlink: Add new "max_vf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y1ZOm7QrbB0bf/H8@unreal>
Date:   Mon, 24 Oct 2022 11:36:43 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Yinjun Zhang <yinjun.zhang@...igine.com>
Cc:     Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>,
        Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
        Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>,
        Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
        Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
        Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Peng Zhang <peng.zhang@...igine.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        oss-drivers@...igine.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] devlink: Add new "max_vf_queue" generic
 device param

On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 09:47:13AM +0800, Yinjun Zhang wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 02:28:24PM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote:
> > [Some people who received this message don't often get email from gal@...dia.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
> > 
> > On 19/10/2022 17:09, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > From: Peng Zhang <peng.zhang@...igine.com>
> > >
> > > VF max-queue-number is the MAX num of queues which the VF has.
> > >
> > > Add new device generic parameter to configure the max-queue-number
> > > of the each VF to be generated dynamically.
> > >
> > > The string format is decided ad vendor specific. The suggested
> > > format is ...-V-W-X-Y-Z, the V represents generating V VFs that
> > > have 16 queues, the W represents generating W VFs that have 8
> > > queues, and so on, the Z represents generating Z VFs that have
> > > 1 queue.

<...>

> > 
> > Does this command have to be run before the VFs are created? What
> > happens to existing VFs?
> 
> Yes in our current implementation, but it's up to the vendor's
> implementation I think.

All vendors should give same look and feel for the users. It is very
frustrating to find that same command should be run in different point
of time just to perform same thing.

Thanks