[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <TYBPR01MB534112D6F52D17617A1995D6D8319@TYBPR01MB5341.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 11:24:10 +0000
From: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"kbuild-all@...ts.01.org" <kbuild-all@...ts.01.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 2/3] net: ethernet: renesas: Add Ethernet Switch driver
Hi Geert-san,
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven, Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 3:48 PM
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 6:39 AM Yoshihiro Shimoda
> <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com> wrote:
> > > From: Geert Uytterhoeven, Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 12:28 AM
> > > To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > > Cc: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>; davem@...emloft.net; edumazet@...gle.com; kuba@...nel.org;
> > > pabeni@...hat.com; robh+dt@...nel.org; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org; kbuild-all@...ts.01.org;
> > > netdev@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] net: ethernet: renesas: Add Ethernet Switch driver
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 1:17 PM kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
> > > > I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
> > > >
> > > > [auto build test WARNING on net-next/master]
> > > > [also build test WARNING on net/master robh/for-next linus/master v6.1-rc1 next-20221019]
> > > > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> > > > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> > > >
> > <snip>
> > > > git checkout f310f8cc37dfb090cfb06ae38530276327569464
> > > > # save the config file
> > > > mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
> > > > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=m68k SHELL=/bin/bash
> > > drivers/net/
> > > >
> > > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
> > > > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > > >
> > > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > > >
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/rswitch.c: In function 'rswitch_ext_desc_get_dptr':
> > > > >> drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/rswitch.c:355:71: warning: left shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow]
> > > > 355 | return __le32_to_cpu(desc->dptrl) | (dma_addr_t)(desc->dptrh) << 32;
> > > > | ^~
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/rswitch.c: In function 'rswitch_ext_ts_desc_get_dptr':
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/rswitch.c:367:71: warning: left shift count >= width of type
> [-Wshift-count-overflow]
> > > > 367 | return __le32_to_cpu(desc->dptrl) | (dma_addr_t)(desc->dptrh) << 32;
> > > > | ^~
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > vim +355 drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/rswitch.c
> > > >
> > > > 352
> > > > 353 static dma_addr_t rswitch_ext_desc_get_dptr(struct rswitch_ext_desc *desc)
> > > > 354 {
> > > > > 355 return __le32_to_cpu(desc->dptrl) | (dma_addr_t)(desc->dptrh) << 32;
> > >
> > > A simple fix would be to replace the cast to "dma_addr_t" by a cast to "u64".
>
> > I got it. I'll fix this by a cast to "u64".
> >
> > > BTW, if struct rswitch_ext_desc would just extend struct rswitch_desc,
> > > you could use rswitch_ext_desc_get_dptr() for both.
> >
> > Yes, all rswitch_xxx_desc just extend struct rswitch_desc.
> > So, I'll modify this function like below:
> > ---
> > /* All struct rswitch_xxx_desc just extend struct rswitch_desc, so that
> > * we can use rswitch_desc_get_dptr() for them.
> > */
> > static dma_addr_t rswitch_desc_get_dptr(void *_desc)
> > {
> > struct rswitch_desc *desc = _desc;
> >
> > return __le32_to_cpu(desc->dptrl) | (u64)(desc->dptrh) << 32;
> > }
>
> While the above would work, the void * parameter inhibits compiler checks.
>
> Hence I suggest defining struct rswitch_ext_desc like:
>
> struct rswitch_ext_desc {
> struct rswitch_desc desc;
> __le64 info1;
> };
>
> Then you can just pass &ext->desc to a function that takes a
> (const) struct rswitch_desc *.
Thank you for your suggestion. It worked correctly.
I'll change both rswitch_desc_get_dptr() and rswitch_desc_set_dptr().
Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda
Powered by blists - more mailing lists