netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 00/16] bridge: Add MAC Authentication Bypass (MAB) support with offload

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 Oct 2022 20:43:16 +0300
From:   Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
To:     netdev@...io-technology.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        edumazet@...gle.com, jiri@...dia.com, petrm@...dia.com,
        ivecera@...hat.com, roopa@...dia.com, razor@...ckwall.org,
        vladimir.oltean@....com, mlxsw@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 00/16] bridge: Add MAC Authentication Bypass
 (MAB) support with offload

On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 04:09:07PM +0200, netdev@...io-technology.com wrote:
> On 2022-10-25 12:00, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > 
> > Future work
> > ===========
> > 
> > The hostapd fork by Westermo is using dynamic FDB entries to authorize
> > hosts [3]. Changes are required in switchdev to allow such entries to be
> > offloaded. Hans already indicated he is working on that [4]. It should
> > not necessitate any uAPI changes so I do not view it as a blocker (Hans,
> > please confirm).
> 
> The dynamic ATU patchset will do changes in the switchdev and DSA layers
> and in the driver of course, so I suppose that confirms what you think
> (e.g. no changes in include/uapi), but it requires the fdb_flags towards
> drivers patches of course and MAB driver changes, that are part of my
> v8 patchset.

Any comments on the merge plan and patches #1-#4?